|StackOverflow question Should I use the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) pattern in Silverlight projects?||Links to a couple of good posts including |
|MSDN Magazine's WPF Apps With The Model-View-ViewModel Design Pattern|| |
Why WPF Developers Love MVVM
|Dan Crevier's DataModel-View-ViewModel pattern series||8-part series including sample DataModel and ViewModel (WPF-focused).|
|David Wynn's Silverlight and the View-ViewModel Pattern||Example using NInject, Silverlight Extensions (Command) and Unit Testing.|
|Josh Smith discusses MVVM eliminates 99% of the need for ValueConverters||Paul Stovell, Laurent Bugnion, Jaime Rodriguez (among others) weigh in on the proposition that: |
The only place I can see a use for value converters in an MVVM architecture is cross-element bindings. If I'm binding the Visibility of a panel to the IsChecked of a CheckBox, then I will need to use the BooleanToVisibilityConverter.
|Mark Heath's Model View View-Model (MVVM) in Silverlight||Basic 'scoreboard' example demonstrating MVVM in Silverlight 2.0|
|John Gossman's Introduction to Model/View/ViewModel pattern for building WPF apps||Whoa - John talks about MVVM back in October 2005, talking about the "Sparkle UI". The MSDN article (above) quote "In fact, Microsoft was using MVVM internally to develop WPF applications, such as Microsoft Expression Blend, while the core WPF platform was under construction" must be true!|
I've kept a copy on conceptdevelopment.net too.